CHAGAN BHIMA GHARBUDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — APPLN/3588/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030381342025

Filing Number

APPLN/9905/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

APPLN/3588/2025

Registration Date

18-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 301

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAGAN BHIMA GHARBUDE

    Adv. Hange Rajendra G.,HANGE ANIRUDH R.,HANGE ANIRUDH R., ,HANGE ANIRUDH R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SUKHDEO SAKHARAM BHAVALE

  3. 3.KISHKINDA SUKHDEO BHAVALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: APPLN/3588/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukhdev Sakharam Bhavale and Kishkinda Sukhdev Bhavale in a murder case. The applicants were accused of murdering Balaji Bhagwan Gharbude on September 3, 2024, allegedly in conspiracy to eliminate him because he had helped secure bail for his father, who was falsely implicated by the applicants' family member. The court found that eyewitness statements corroborated the prosecution's allegations that Sukhdev assaulted the victim and Kishkinda restrained him while others inflicted fatal stab wounds. Although the applicants claimed they were elsewhere (at banks) and requested CCTV footage to prove their alibi, they produced no supporting documents. Given the serious nature of the murder charge under Section 103 BNS (punishable by death or life imprisonment) and the substantial eyewitness evidence, the court deemed anticipatory bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  14. 20-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    Due Admission (Criminal)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  16. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  18. 18-Dec-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  19. 08-Dec-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  20. 10-Nov-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  21. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  22. 10-Oct-2025

    Due Admission -Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  23. 25-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 20-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  25. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPLN/3588/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPLN/3588/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukhdev Sakharam Bhavale and Kishkinda Sukhdev Bhavale in a murder case. The applicants were accused of murdering Balaji Bhagwan Gharbude on September 3, 2024, allegedly in conspiracy to eliminate him because he had helped secure bail for his father, who was falsely implicated by the applicants' family member. The court found that eyewitness statements corroborated the prosecution's allegations that Sukhdev assaulted the victim and Kishkinda restrained him while others inflicted fatal stab wounds. Although the applicants claimed they were elsewhere (at banks) and requested CCTV footage to prove their alibi, they produced no supporting documents. Given the serious nature of the murder charge under Section 103 BNS (punishable by death or life imprisonment) and the substantial eyewitness evidence, the court deemed anticipatory bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case