MAITREYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, AURANGABAD vs NANDKUMAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - Govt. Pleader — CP/7/2018
Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030380312017
Next Hearing
09th January 2018
Filing Number
CP/30941/2017
Filing Date
15-09-2017
Registration No
CP/7/2018
Registration Date
05-01-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAITREYA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, AURANGABAD
Adv. DESHMUKH YOGESH P.
Respondent(s)
NANDKUMAR AND ANOTHER Advocate - Govt. Pleader
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2018 | FOR ORDERS UNSERVED NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 09-01-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 09-03-2020 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 19-03-2019 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-01-2019 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
Orders
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S V GANGAPURWALA,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN M. DHAVALE
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the petition, finding that the petitioner's proposal was limited to academic year 2016-2017 and was no longer current. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh proposal for a similar matter rather than deciding the expired proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the petition, finding that the petitioner's proposal was limited to academic year 2016-2017 and was no longer current. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh proposal for a similar matter rather than deciding the expired proposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts