SYED AHMED ALIAS GOLU SAYED AZAM AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/1147/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030379732025
e-Filing Number
17-09-2025
Filing Number
WP/9863/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
APPLN/1147/2026
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Criminal Application
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SYED AHMED ALIAS GOLU SAYED AZAM AND ANOTHER
Adv. GHANEKAR NILESH S.
-
2.SYED AMAN SYED AZAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Adv. GAIKWAD ASHOK PRAKASHRAO FOR R/2,PP WAIVES FOR R/1 1123
-
2.SHAIKH AYUB SHAIKH NOOR
Adv. GAIKWAD ASHOK PRAKASHRAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF
Case Summary: APPLN/1147/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction of two young men (ages 19 and 21) for attempted murder under Section 307 IPC. The court found the parties had reached a genuine, voluntary settlement, with the injured victim himself appearing before the court confirming amicable resolution and requesting compounding of the offense. The court applied Section 482 CrPC to quash the conviction based on: (1) genuine settlement deed signed by both parties; (2) the injured party's voluntary support for compounding; (3) minimal criminal antecedents; (4) conviction primarily resting on the injured's testimony, who now sought reconciliation; and (5) reliance on recent Supreme Court precedent endorsing settlement in non-compoundable offenses. Appellants were acquitted but ordered to pay ₹1,00,000 costs to a cancer hospital. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Urgent Circulation-Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
10-Dec-2025
Urgent Circulation-Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
26-Nov-2025
Urgent Orders -Criminal
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar
-
25-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. APPLN/1147/2026
Case Summary: APPLN/1147/2026 The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction of two young men (ages 19 and 21) for attempted murder under Section 307 IPC. The court found the parties had reached a genuine, voluntary settlement, with the injured victim himself appearing before the court confirming amicable resolution and requesting compounding of the offense. The court applied Section 482 CrPC to quash the conviction based on: (1) genuine settlement deed signed by both parties; (2) the injured party's voluntary support for compounding; (3) minimal criminal antecedents; (4) conviction primarily resting on the injured's testimony, who now sought reconciliation; and (5) reliance on recent Supreme Court precedent endorsing settlement in non-compoundable offenses. Appellants were acquitted but ordered to pay ₹1,00,000 costs to a cancer hospital. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts