RAVER SHIKSHAN SANVARDHAKSANGH RAVER THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — CP/711/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030379712018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th October 2018

Filing Number

CP/30017/2018

Filing Date

28-09-2018

Registration No

CP/711/2018

Registration Date

04-10-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

RAVER SHIKSHAN SANVARDHAKSANGH RAVER THROUGH THE CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER

Adv. Panpatte V. S.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Adv. R.2 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

05-10-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

12-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Raver Shikshan Sanvardhaksangh against the State of Maharashtra. The court found the petition infructuous as the respondent had already complied with the contempt order, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of a Contempt Petition filed by Raver Shikshan Sanvardhaksangh against the State of Maharashtra. The court found the petition infructuous as the respondent had already complied with the contempt order, and accordingly disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case