GAYATRI SANTOSH SONAWANE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/771/2018

Case under Contempt of Court Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-Oct-2018

CNR: HCBM030379652018

Filing Number

CP/30014/2018

Filing Date

28-Sep-2018

Registration No

CP/771/2018

Registration Date

23-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAYATRI SANTOSH SONAWANE

    Adv. Deshmukh Anand I.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. R.2 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the petition, finding that while the petitioner had completed her course, the degree certificate had not yet been issued. However, the court determined that all directions previously issued in the matter had been complied with, leaving no surviving issues for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Mar-2020

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    According To Sitting List

  4. 29-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  5. 29-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/771/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the petition, finding that while the petitioner had completed her course, the degree certificate had not yet been issued. However, the court determined that all directions previously issued in the matter had been complied with, leaving no surviving issues for adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case