The Executive Director Tapi Khore Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon vs Ananda Ramchandra Patil Died Through Legal Heirs 1A Devidas Ananda Patil — HCBM30379592025
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM030379592025
e-Filing Number
13-09-2025
Filing Number
FA/28085/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Judge
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
Coram
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Executive Director Tapi Khore Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Jalgaon
Adv. Patil Sandesh R.
-
2.The Executive Engineer Girna Kalva Nutanikaran Vibhag 2 Jalgaon now Jalgaon Medium Project Division
Adv. SANDESH R PATIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ananda Ramchandra Patil Died Through Legal Heirs 1A Devidas Ananda Patil
-
2.1 B Sahebrao Ananda Patil
-
3.The Collector Jalgaon
-
4.SLAO Upper Tapi Project Hatnur Jalgaon
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed three consolidated civil applications filed by property owners disputing land acquisition compensation. The court permitted applicants to withdraw 75% of deposited compensation upon furnishing an undertaking, with the remaining 25% available upon providing solvent surety/security to the Judicial Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no malafides, and admitted the first appeals for substantive hearing on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Nov-2025
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)View PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
Objections Not Removed (Second Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
04-Nov-2025
Objections Not Removed (First Time)
Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)
-
14-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) partly allowed three consolidated civil applications filed by property owners disputing land acquisition compensation. The court permitted applicants to withdraw 75% of deposited compensation upon furnishing an undertaking, with the remaining 25% available upon providing solvent surety/security to the Judicial Registrar. The court also condoned delays in preferring first appeals, finding no malafides, and admitted the first appeals for substantive hearing on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts