SYED HASAN DIED THROUGH LRS SAYEDA MAHEMUDA BEGUM SAYED HASAN AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - Thoke Dhananjay B, COPY SERVED ON GP,PARTY IN PERSON,(ORDER DATE DIFFER) — WP/88/2019
Case under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030374052017
Filing Number
WP/30469/2017
Filing Date
11-Sep-2017
Registration No
WP/88/2019
Registration Date
02-Jan-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SYED HASAN DIED THROUGH LRS SAYEDA MAHEMUDA BEGUM SAYED HASAN AND OTHERS
Adv. Palodkar Devdatt P.
-
2.SAYED USMAN SAYED HASAN
-
3.SAYED YASIN SAYED HASAN
-
4.SAYED NASIR SAYED HASAN
-
5.SAYED HANIFA SAYED HASAN
-
6.SAYED KHALIL SAYED HASAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - Thoke Dhananjay B, COPY SERVED ON GP,PARTY IN PERSON,(ORDER DATE DIFFER)
-
2.PRADIP NARAYAN CHOUDHARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 88 of 2019 on 8th May 2026 after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a related appeal had been decided during the petition's pendency, rendering the writ petition moot. Accordingly, the court found nothing surviving in the petition and disposed of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2020
Notification
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav
-
06-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF
-
06-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/88/2019
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 88 of 2019 on 8th May 2026 after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a related appeal had been decided during the petition's pendency, rendering the writ petition moot. Accordingly, the court found nothing surviving in the petition and disposed of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts