SYED HASAN DIED THROUGH LRS SAYEDA MAHEMUDA BEGUM SAYED HASAN AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - Thoke Dhananjay B, COPY SERVED ON GP,PARTY IN PERSON,(ORDER DATE DIFFER) — WP/88/2019

Case under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030374052017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th February 2020

Filing Number

WP/30469/2017

Filing Date

11-09-2017

Registration No

WP/88/2019

Registration Date

02-01-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Petitioner(s)

SYED HASAN DIED THROUGH LRS SAYEDA MAHEMUDA BEGUM SAYED HASAN AND OTHERS

Adv. Palodkar Devdatt P.

SAYED USMAN SAYED HASAN

SAYED YASIN SAYED HASAN

SAYED NASIR SAYED HASAN

SAYED HANIFA SAYED HASAN

SAYED KHALIL SAYED HASAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - Thoke Dhananjay B, COPY SERVED ON GP,PARTY IN PERSON,(ORDER DATE DIFFER)

PRADIP NARAYAN CHOUDHARI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

06-02-2020

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

19-06-2020

NOTIFICATION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 88 of 2019 on 8th May 2026 after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a related appeal had been decided during the petition's pendency, rendering the writ petition moot. Accordingly, the court found nothing surviving in the petition and disposed of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petition No. 88 of 2019 on 8th May 2026 after the petitioners' counsel informed the court that a related appeal had been decided during the petition's pendency, rendering the writ petition moot. Accordingly, the court found nothing surviving in the petition and disposed of it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case