GAHININATH UTTAM ANDHALE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/737/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030373362018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

15th October 2018

Filing Number

CP/29499/2018

Filing Date

26-09-2018

Registration No

CP/737/2018

Registration Date

11-10-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

GAHININATH UTTAM ANDHALE AND OTHERS

Adv. BHAPKAR SANJAY LAXMAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. R/4 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

04-01-2019

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

12-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

15-10-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

Orders

15-10-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE
06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Gahininath Uttam Andhale and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the state had complied with the contempt order by calculating and forwarding interest amounts on rental compensation to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patoda District Beed, and accordingly closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Gahininath Uttam Andhale and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the state had complied with the contempt order by calculating and forwarding interest amounts on rental compensation to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patoda District Beed, and accordingly closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Contempt of Court Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case