GAHININATH UTTAM ANDHALE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/737/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030373362018
Filing Number
CP/29499/2018
Filing Date
26-Sep-2018
Registration No
CP/737/2018
Registration Date
11-Oct-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GAHININATH UTTAM ANDHALE AND OTHERS
Adv. BHAPKAR SANJAY LAXMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. R/4 SERVED 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Gahininath Uttam Andhale and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the state had complied with the contempt order by calculating and forwarding interest amounts on rental compensation to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patoda District Beed, and accordingly closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
04-Jan-2019
Regular Admission (Civil)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane
-
15-Oct-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
15-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CP/737/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Gahininath Uttam Andhale and others against the State of Maharashtra. The court found that the state had complied with the contempt order by calculating and forwarding interest amounts on rental compensation to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Patoda District Beed, and accordingly closed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts