SHARDA RAJENDRA GAIKWAD AND OTHERS A.B.KALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/8834/2013

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030363772013

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

07th March 2014

Filing Number

WP/29390/2013

Filing Date

17-10-2013

Registration No

WP/8834/2013

Registration Date

19-10-2013

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet

Petitioner(s)

SHARDA RAJENDRA GAIKWAD AND OTHERS A.B.KALE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. GP FOR R/1 TO 3,Suryawanshi Prashant D.,R/5 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

03-12-2018

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

14-02-2017

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

09-10-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)

13-06-2016

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

26-10-2016

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed both writ petitions. The court found that land compensation sought by petitioners for alleged acquisition in 1991 was not valid because the road in question was constructed on pre-existing government cart road shown in 1970 sale deeds, making land acquisition unnecessary. The court held petitioners failed to explain 15-year delay in seeking compensation and rejected their claim as the acquisition award had been validly cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed both writ petitions. The court found that land compensation sought by petitioners for alleged acquisition in 1991 was not valid because the road in question was constructed on pre-existing government cart road shown in 1970 sale deeds, making land acquisition unnecessary. The court held petitioners failed to explain 15-year delay in seeking compensation and rejected their claim as the acquisition award had been validly cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case