ANJANA SHAH KALPANA B AVACHAR vs PRIYANKA SHIRSAT AND ANOTHER — HCBM30355742025

Case under Constitution of India Section 14,21,226 AND 227. Next hearing: 09th September 2025.

Next hearing 09-Sep-2025

CNR: HCBM030355742025

Filing Number

WP/26265/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Judge

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 14,21,226 AND 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANJANA SHAH KALPANA B AVACHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRIYANKA SHIRSAT AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT

Case History

  1. 09-Sep-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    This is a batch of 37 writ petitions at the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) including the case of Anjana Shah & Kalpana B Avachar v. Priyanka Shirsat & Another. The Registrar (Judicial) granted the petitioners two weeks to remove office objections, warning that failure to do so would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. This was the third listing for objection removal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This is a batch of 37 writ petitions at the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) including the case of Anjana Shah & Kalpana B Avachar v. Priyanka Shirsat & Another. The Registrar (Judicial) granted the petitioners two weeks to remove office objections, warning that failure to do so would result in automatic refusal of registration without further court reference. This was the third listing for objection removal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case