HARSHALI CHANDRASHEKHAR PAWAR vs SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE AND OTHERS — HCBM30354892025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 09th September 2025.

Next hearing 09-Sep-2025

CNR: HCBM030354892025

Filing Number

WP/26198/2025

Filing Date

02-Sep-2025

Judge

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Coram

Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Caste Claim - St

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARSHALI CHANDRASHEKHAR PAWAR

    Adv. Deshmukh Mahesh S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE AND OTHERS

  2. 2.SCHEDULED TRIBE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY

  3. 3.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

Case History

  1. 09-Sep-2025

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 Scheduled Tribe certificate-related writ petitions for the third time on 15/06/2026. As petitioners failed to appear for removal of office objections despite previous extensions, the court granted a final two-week deadline to cure defects, warning that automatic refusal of registration would follow upon non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Rajesh A. Sasne (Registrar Judl.)

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  6. 04-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned 37 Scheduled Tribe certificate-related writ petitions for the third time on 15/06/2026. As petitioners failed to appear for removal of office objections despite previous extensions, the court granted a final two-week deadline to cure defects, warning that automatic refusal of registration would follow upon non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case