GOPAL SURESHCHANDRA LADDA AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — WP/12785/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030354082025

Filing Number

WP/26128/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

WP/12785/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah.regional Town Planning Act 1966

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL SURESHCHANDRA LADDA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. KADAM NITIN SHAMRAO

  2. 2.RAMESHWAR RAMDAYAL TAWANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ADV. RAVIRAJ R. CHANDAK FOR R.2.,AGP FOR R/1 1123

  2. 2.MUNICIOAL COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHEF OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Aug-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/12785/2025 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a land reservation. The court declared that the garden reservation on the petitioners' 41-acre property (Survey No. 249/3) at Manwath, originally marked as Site No. 63 in the 2002 Development Plan and reinstated as Site No. 28 in May 2025, has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966. The court granted relief because the Municipal Council admitted it took no acquisition steps within the required two-year period, thus the reservation automatically lapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12785/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/12785/2025 The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a land reservation. The court declared that the garden reservation on the petitioners' 41-acre property (Survey No. 249/3) at Manwath, originally marked as Site No. 63 in the 2002 Development Plan and reinstated as Site No. 28 in May 2025, has lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966. The court granted relief because the Municipal Council admitted it took no acquisition steps within the required two-year period, thus the reservation automatically lapsed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case