SUKHDEV SAKHARAM BHAVLE AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — ABA/1534/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030353562025

Filing Number

ABA/9261/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

ABA/1534/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,61,189,191,190,126,127

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUKHDEV SAKHARAM BHAVLE AND ANOTHER

    Adv. DODIYA RAMANKUMAR GOPAL

  2. 2.KISHKINDA SUKHDEV BHAVLE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

    Case Summary: ABA/1534/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukhdev Sakharam Bhavle and Kishkinda Sukhdev Bhavle in a murder case (Crime No. 287/2024, Talwada Police Station, Beed District). Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case sufficiently strong, citing eye-witness statements corroborating the FIR allegations, post-mortem evidence of multiple stab injuries, and the serious nature of charges under Section 103 BNS (murder, punishable by death or life imprisonment). The applicants' alibi claims—that they were at banks on the incident date—lacked documentary support (no bank records, passbooks, or withdrawal forms). The court deemed this unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the severity of allegations and evidence collected during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  7. 08-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  8. 07-Apr-2026

    At 2.30 P.M

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  10. 25-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  12. 24-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  13. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  14. 20-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  16. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  18. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF

  19. 18-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  20. 08-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan

  21. 10-Nov-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  22. 10-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  23. 10-Oct-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  24. 25-Sep-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  25. 24-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  26. 20-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  27. 20-Sep-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  28. 10-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. DhoteView PDF

  29. 10-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/1534/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/1534/2025 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Sukhdev Sakharam Bhavle and Kishkinda Sukhdev Bhavle in a murder case (Crime No. 287/2024, Talwada Police Station, Beed District). Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution's case sufficiently strong, citing eye-witness statements corroborating the FIR allegations, post-mortem evidence of multiple stab injuries, and the serious nature of charges under Section 103 BNS (murder, punishable by death or life imprisonment). The applicants' alibi claims—that they were at banks on the incident date—lacked documentary support (no bank records, passbooks, or withdrawal forms). The court deemed this unsuitable for anticipatory bail given the severity of allegations and evidence collected during investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case