UMESH RAM GIRI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/11068/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030351592018
Filing Number
WP/27817/2018
Filing Date
10-Sep-2018
Registration No
WP/11068/2018
Registration Date
03-Oct-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH RAM GIRI
Adv. NARWADKAR MRIGESH D.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF
The High Court at Aurangabad allowed Umesh Ram Giri's writ petition, quashing the land forfeiture order against him. The court found that the Deputy Collector's 2012 forfeiture order, upheld by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, was unsustainable because authorities failed to act within three years of the 1995 sale deed, violating established precedent that revisional powers under the Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act must be exercised within three years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2020
Due Admission [ After Notice ]
According To Sitting List
-
03-Apr-2019
Due Admission [ After Notice ]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
11-Mar-2019
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
30-Jan-2019
Due Admission CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
07-Jan-2019
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
28-Nov-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF
-
28-Nov-2018
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar
-
04-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. WP/11068/2018
The High Court at Aurangabad allowed Umesh Ram Giri's writ petition, quashing the land forfeiture order against him. The court found that the Deputy Collector's 2012 forfeiture order, upheld by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, was unsustainable because authorities failed to act within three years of the 1995 sale deed, violating established precedent that revisional powers under the Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act must be exercised within three years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts