INDUMATI HAUSRAO LABADE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - SANCHETI RAHUL RATILAL, FOR R-5 AND 6,KARANDE MAHESH B,Nitin V Gaware Patil,R/3 AND 4,GP FOR R/1 AND 2 — WP/11702/2017
Case under Maharashtra Pre of Frg& Con Holding Act-1947. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030349542017
Next Hearing
07th March 2018
Filing Number
WP/28488/2017
Filing Date
24-08-2017
Registration No
WP/11702/2017
Registration Date
21-09-2017
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INDUMATI HAUSRAO LABADE AND OTHERS
Adv. Rode Dilip B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Advocate - SANCHETI RAHUL RATILAL, FOR R-5 AND 6,KARANDE MAHESH B,Nitin V Gaware Patil,R/3 AND 4,GP FOR R/1 AND 2
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS - COPIES NOT SUPPLIED -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2018 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-04-2018 | FOR ORDERS - COPIES NOT SUPPLIED -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 04-09-2018 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 21-08-2018 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 17-12-2019 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad remanded the case to the Deputy Director, Land Records for fresh decision-making. The petitioners challenged a June 20, 2017 order by the Revenue Minister that reduced their land holdings, and the court found the issue squarely covered by precedent in WP No.13712/2017. The Deputy Director must now reconsider the matter afresh, providing parties an opportunity to be heard and deciding according to law with proper justification for any reduction in landholdings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad remanded the case to the Deputy Director, Land Records for fresh decision-making. The petitioners challenged a June 20, 2017 order by the Revenue Minister that reduced their land holdings, and the court found the issue squarely covered by precedent in WP No.13712/2017. The Deputy Director must now reconsider the matter afresh, providing parties an opportunity to be heard and deciding according to law with proper justification for any reduction in landholdings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts