ANIL GANJIDHAR PAWAR vs A.S. AHIRE CUSTODIAN DHULE ZILLA PARISHAD EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ANOTHER — WP/208/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030348112025

Filing Number

WP/25698/2025

Filing Date

22-Aug-2025

Registration No

WP/208/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL GANJIDHAR PAWAR

    Adv. PARTY IN PERSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.S. AHIRE CUSTODIAN DHULE ZILLA PARISHAD EMPLOYEES CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.SHRI PANDIT PATIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed both writ petitions filed by Anil Ganjidhar Pawar challenging a notice to remove his name from cooperative housing society plots. The court found the petitions lacked merit on multiple grounds: writs cannot be issued against private parties, disputed factual questions exist regarding custodian appointment, no resolution authorized Pawar to file the petition, and the notice constitutes only a legal notice without final order—creating no actionable cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    First On Board [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Objections Not Removed (Third Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)View PDF

  14. 24-Nov-2025

    Objections Not Removed (Second Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    Objections Not Removed (First Time)

    Shri Pradeep B. Ghuge (Registrar Judl.)

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 22-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed both writ petitions filed by Anil Ganjidhar Pawar challenging a notice to remove his name from cooperative housing society plots. The court found the petitions lacked merit on multiple grounds: writs cannot be issued against private parties, disputed factual questions exist regarding custodian appointment, no resolution authorized Pawar to file the petition, and the notice constitutes only a legal notice without final order—creating no actionable cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case