SACHIN SARJERAO NADE vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS — WP/9591/2014

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Oct-2014

CNR: HCBM030337492014

Filing Number

WP/26332/2014

Filing Date

30-Sep-2014

Registration No

WP/9591/2014

Registration Date

29-Oct-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SACHIN SARJERAO NADE

    Adv. ADE RAVINDRA B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

    Adv. ASG FOR R/1 & 2,R/3 SERVED.,Suryawanshi Surendra V.,BAGUL RAHUL BHAGAWANTRAO,NAGODE DATTA GOVINDRAO,DEVE SADANAND S. FOR R.NO. 1 AND 2 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the petition of Sachin Sarjerao Nade, who challenged his rejection for the Fireman position at Ordnance Factory, Dehu Road, Pune. The court found that although Nade passed the written examination, his eligibility certificate from Jan Shikshan Sansthan was not recognized by the State or Central Government as required by the job advertisement, which explicitly stipulated that fire-fighting course institutions must have government recognition. The court upheld the rejection as valid and non-arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant,hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. GhodeswarView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sushil M. Ghodeswar

  7. 27-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  8. 14-Jul-2015

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  9. 14-Jul-2015

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  10. 19-Jun-2015

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  11. 19-Jun-2015

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  12. 28-Apr-2015

    Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde , Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  13. 19-Mar-2015

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde , Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  14. 05-Feb-2015

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya

  15. 11-Dec-2014

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  16. 30-Oct-2014

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  17. 30-Oct-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 30-Sep-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/9591/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the petition of Sachin Sarjerao Nade, who challenged his rejection for the Fireman position at Ordnance Factory, Dehu Road, Pune. The court found that although Nade passed the written examination, his eligibility certificate from Jan Shikshan Sansthan was not recognized by the State or Central Government as required by the job advertisement, which explicitly stipulated that fire-fighting course institutions must have government recognition. The court upheld the rejection as valid and non-arbitrary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case