JASPAL HARDAYALSING GHAI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/5099/2015
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030337452014
Next Hearing
13th July 2016
Filing Number
WP/26328/2014
Filing Date
30-09-2014
Registration No
WP/5099/2015
Registration Date
02-05-2015
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASPAL HARDAYALSING GHAI
Adv. Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. COPY SERVED ON G P 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-07-2016 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 10-10-2016 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 08-09-2016 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 16-08-2016 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 13-07-2016 | REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5099/2015 Jaspal Hardayalsing Ghai v. The State of Maharashtra and Others The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging a 1998 land acquisition by CIDCO for road widening near Aurangabad. The court found petitioners had constructive knowledge of acquisition proceedings from 1991 draft plan notification and publication of awards, and held the MRTP Act (governing acquisition) does not incorporate Land Acquisition Act provisions regarding lapsing of proceedings, rendering delay and laches arguments inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5099/2015 Jaspal Hardayalsing Ghai v. The State of Maharashtra and Others The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging a 1998 land acquisition by CIDCO for road widening near Aurangabad. The court found petitioners had constructive knowledge of acquisition proceedings from 1991 draft plan notification and publication of awards, and held the MRTP Act (governing acquisition) does not incorporate Land Acquisition Act provisions regarding lapsing of proceedings, rendering delay and laches arguments inapplicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts