GORAKH RAIBHAN @ MATTU SHINDE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — APEAL/379/2017

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 374(2). Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Aug-2017

CNR: HCBM030336732017

Filing Number

APEAL/402/2017

Filing Date

16-Aug-2017

Registration No

APEAL/379/2017

Registration Date

16-Aug-2017

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 374(2)
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 436

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GORAKH RAIBHAN @ MATTU SHINDE AND OTHERS

    Adv. Devakate Anant Ramahari

  2. 2.MACHINDRA S/O. RAIBHAN @ MATTU SHINDE

  3. 3.PRADIP @ PRALHAD S/O. MACHINDRA SHINDE

  4. 4.BALBHIM @ BANDU S/O. MACHINDRA SHINDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

    Adv. R NO 2 SERVED,GHANEKAR NILESH S.,FOR RNO. 2 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 379/2017 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the criminal appeal filed by Gorakh Raibhan Shinde and others against their conviction under Section 436 r.w. 34 IPC (punishment for mischief by fire or explosive substance). The appellants had been sentenced to five years imprisonment plus a fine, but the matter was subsequently compromised between the parties. After the appellants deposited Rs. 10,000 each (totaling Rs. 40,000) as directed by the court, and upon the informant's affidavit confirming settlement, the court quashed the conviction, set aside the FIR, and acquitted all accused of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Apr-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  4. 11-Apr-2018

    For Admission - After Notice-Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  5. 11-Apr-2018

    For Admission - After Notice-Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  6. 14-Mar-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  7. 14-Mar-2018

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  8. 06-Mar-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  9. 06-Mar-2018

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  10. 14-Feb-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane

  11. 14-Feb-2018

    For Orders - Office Objection Not Removed-Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane

  12. 17-Jan-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil

  13. 17-Jan-2018

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil

  14. 19-Dec-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. PatilView PDF

  15. 19-Dec-2017

    Due Orders Criminal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil

  16. 06-Nov-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. BoraView PDF

  17. 06-Nov-2017

    For Admission - After Notice Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  18. 27-Sep-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. BoraView PDF

  19. 27-Sep-2017

    For Admission - After Notice Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  20. 13-Sep-2017

    For Admission - After Notice-Criminal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora

  21. 16-Aug-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice P.R. BoraView PDF

  22. 16-Aug-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 16-Aug-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/379/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 379/2017 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the criminal appeal filed by Gorakh Raibhan Shinde and others against their conviction under Section 436 r.w. 34 IPC (punishment for mischief by fire or explosive substance). The appellants had been sentenced to five years imprisonment plus a fine, but the matter was subsequently compromised between the parties. After the appellants deposited Rs. 10,000 each (totaling Rs. 40,000) as directed by the court, and upon the informant's affidavit confirming settlement, the court quashed the conviction, set aside the FIR, and acquitted all accused of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case