MALLIKARJUN BHAURAO CHINCHOLIKAR vs SHAKUNTALABAI BHASKAR KULKARNI, L.RS. SURESH BHASKAR KULKARNI AND OTHERS — CA/3322/2019

Case under Bombay Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030334582014

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

06th May 2020

Filing Number

CA/26079/2014

Filing Date

29-09-2014

Registration No

CA/3322/2019

Registration Date

01-03-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Bombay Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

MALLIKARJUN BHAURAO CHINCHOLIKAR

Adv. Chaudhari N. L.

Respondent(s)

SHAKUNTALABAI BHASKAR KULKARNI, L.RS. SURESH BHASKAR KULKARNI AND OTHERS

Adv. IN WP,STATEMENT MADE ALONG WITH,R.nos. 1/E/2 and 1/E/3 are served.,R. No. 1 (f) 1 is served.,R.Nos. 1/E/1 and 1/F/2 SERVED THROUGH PAPER PUBLICATION. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

06-05-2020

NOTIFICATION

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE

11-03-2026
06-01-2026
24-09-2025

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Case Summary: CA/3322/2019 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the civil application filed by Mallikarjun Bhaurao Chincholikar. The court permitted the legal representatives of the respondent to be brought on record after service was completed through newspaper publication, condoned any delay, and set aside any abatement. The court directed necessary amendments within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/3322/2019 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) allowed the civil application filed by Mallikarjun Bhaurao Chincholikar. The court permitted the legal representatives of the respondent to be brought on record after service was completed through newspaper publication, condoned any delay, and set aside any abatement. The court directed necessary amendments within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case