HUSSAIN SAKHAUDDIN MULLA AND OTHERS vs NANDLAL BANSILAL BIDADA AND OTHERS — CA/12134/2018

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Mar-2020

CNR: HCBM030321352018

Filing Number

CA/25358/2018

Filing Date

23-Aug-2018

Registration No

CA/12134/2018

Registration Date

29-Sep-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HUSSAIN SAKHAUDDIN MULLA AND OTHERS

    Adv. Kazi S S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANDLAL BANSILAL BIDADA AND OTHERS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON SHRI G L AWALE ADV FOR,PET.IN WP 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Application No. 12134/2018 following the intervenor's withdrawal request. The court also disposed of the contempt petition, noting that the respondent had been directed in 2017 to take a decision regarding the petitioner's allotment of open space, and presumed this decision must have been taken by 2026 due to the passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2020

    For Orders - Copies Not Supplied -CIVIL Side Matters

    According To Sitting List

  4. 23-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/12134/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Application No. 12134/2018 following the intervenor's withdrawal request. The court also disposed of the contempt petition, noting that the respondent had been directed in 2017 to take a decision regarding the petitioner's allotment of open space, and presumed this decision must have been taken by 2026 due to the passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case