CRESCENT ENTERTAINMENT AND TOURISM LTD vs SANJAY KAPADNIS AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Bora Satyajit S. — CP/635/2015

Case under Mah.regional Town Planning Act 1966. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030316262015

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

02nd April 2018

Filing Number

CP/25016/2015

Filing Date

26-08-2015

Registration No

CP/635/2015

Registration Date

04-11-2015

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah.regional Town Planning Act 1966
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

CRESCENT ENTERTAINMENT AND TOURISM LTD

Adv. Katneshwarkar S.P.,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER, ADV A D SOMAN AND G V PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER

Respondent(s)

SANJAY KAPADNIS AND ANOTHERS Advocate - Bora Satyajit S.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

02-04-2018

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

20-04-2020

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

02-04-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. GAVHANE
05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Crescent Entertainment and Tourism Ltd, finding that the petitioner's representation from 2011 had been decided and the petitioner's prolonged absence indicated no live matter remained. The court disposed of the petition as nothing survives due to passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Crescent Entertainment and Tourism Ltd, finding that the petitioner's representation from 2011 had been decided and the petitioner's prolonged absence indicated no live matter remained. The court disposed of the petition as nothing survives due to passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Mah.regional Town Planning Act 1966 Contempt of Court Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case