M/S RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR vs SANJAY KAPADNIS — CP/630/2015

Case under Bombay Provincial Mun.cor Act 1949. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030316222015

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

03rd April 2018

Filing Number

CP/25012/2015

Filing Date

26-08-2015

Registration No

CP/630/2015

Registration Date

04-11-2015

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Bombay Provincial Mun.cor Act 1949
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

M/S RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD THROUGH DIRECTOR

Adv. Katneshwarkar S.P.,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER, ADV A D SOMAN AND G V PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER,SOMAN AMAR D. AND G. V. PADALKAR FOR PETITIONER

Respondent(s)

SANJAY KAPADNIS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

20-04-2020

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

03-04-2018

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

Orders

03-04-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.S. SHINDE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. GAVHANE
05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the continuation petition filed by Rajmudra Real Estate Pvt Ltd. Despite the petitioner's counsel arguing that their representation remained undecided, the court found that an order from 2012 combined with the petitioner's prolonged absence indicated the representation had been decided. The petition was dismissed as nothing survived due to passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the continuation petition filed by Rajmudra Real Estate Pvt Ltd. Despite the petitioner's counsel arguing that their representation remained undecided, the court found that an order from 2012 combined with the petitioner's prolonged absence indicated the representation had been decided. The petition was dismissed as nothing survived due to passage of time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Bombay Provincial Mun.cor Act 1949 Contempt of Court Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case