MARUTI LAXMAN SARANE AND ANOTHER vs U P S MADAN AND OTHERS — CP/2/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030315282018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

04th January 2019

Filing Number

CP/24926/2018

Filing Date

20-08-2018

Registration No

CP/2/2019

Registration Date

03-01-2019

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

MARUTI LAXMAN SARANE AND ANOTHER

Adv. Kendre Namdev D

Respondent(s)

U P S MADAN AND OTHERS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

04-01-2019

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

07-11-2019

REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)

20-04-2020

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

05-12-2019

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

04-01-2019
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. GAVHANE
08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Maruti Laxman Sarane and another. The court inferred that since a contempt order was passed in 2016 and the petitioners did not approach the court thereafter, they must have received the revised pension payment as directed in the original order. Finding no surviving issues, the petition was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Maruti Laxman Sarane and another. The court inferred that since a contempt order was passed in 2016 and the petitioners did not approach the court thereafter, they must have received the revised pension payment as directed in the original order. Finding no surviving issues, the petition was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Constitution of India Contempt of Court Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case