RAMRAO GOPALRAO AGLAVE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/618/2018
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030314312018
Filing Number
CP/24854/2018
Filing Date
20-Aug-2018
Registration No
CP/618/2018
Registration Date
24-Aug-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMRAO GOPALRAO AGLAVE
Adv. Panpatte V. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Ramrao Gopalrao Aglave. The court found that directions regarding approval of the petitioner's appointment had been issued in 2018 and should have been complied with; since the petitioner took no further action thereafter, the petition was dismissed as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2020
Notification
According To Sitting List
-
14-Sep-2018
Await Notices CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
30-Aug-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
30-Aug-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CP/618/2018
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Ramrao Gopalrao Aglave. The court found that directions regarding approval of the petitioner's appointment had been issued in 2018 and should have been complied with; since the petitioner took no further action thereafter, the petition was dismissed as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts