DEVIDAS PIRAJI THORAT PATIL MAHESH H. vs ARVIND (ARUN) P. THORAT AND OTHERS — CA/8277/2025
Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030312032025
Filing Number
CA/23094/2025
Filing Date
30-Jul-2025
Registration No
CA/8277/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. Pathan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVIDAS PIRAJI THORAT PATIL MAHESH H.
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVIND (ARUN) P. THORAT AND OTHERS
Adv. COPY SERVED ON ADV.MR.SANDIP C.SWAMI CHAKURKAR FOR R.NO.4 TO 7 (STATEMENT MADE ON P.F) 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted the applicant's request for an extension of time to publish notice to Respondent No. 3-C, acknowledging that notice in the Civil Application was inadvertently published instead of notice in the Second Appeal. The court extended the time by six weeks to rectify this procedural error. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Mehroz K. PathanView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
18-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CA/8277/2025
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted the applicant's request for an extension of time to publish notice to Respondent No. 3-C, acknowledging that notice in the Civil Application was inadvertently published instead of notice in the Second Appeal. The court extended the time by six weeks to rectify this procedural error. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts