SHENDRA SIEMENS KAMGAR / KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THROUGH SECRETARY vs SIEMENS LTD THROUGH ITS FACTORY INCHARGE — CA/9297/2019

Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.

Next hearing 06-May-2026

CNR: HCBM030310752019

Filing Number

CA/23861/2019

Filing Date

31-Jul-2019

Registration No

CA/9297/2019

Registration Date

02-Aug-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHENDRA SIEMENS KAMGAR / KARMACHARI SANGHATANA THROUGH SECRETARY

    Adv. Kawre B.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIEMENS LTD THROUGH ITS FACTORY INCHARGE

    Adv. IN WP 1123

Case History

  1. 06-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    Summary of CA/9297/2019 Writ Petition Dismissed: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Siemens Ltd.'s writ petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal's 2018 order, upholding the tribunal's finding that the company employed more than 100 workmen and therefore required government permission under Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act for its 2014 closure. The court found the company artificially restricted headcount to 99 by misclassifying maintenance and assembly staff, rejected its burden-of-proof arguments, and noted non-production of wage registers warranted adverse inference against the employer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  10. 20-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

  12. 11-Dec-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  16. 11-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. SantView PDF

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  19. 13-Oct-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  22. 18-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF

  23. 08-Apr-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Kishore C. Sant

  25. 13-Jan-2025

    Revoked

    According To Sitting List

  26. 27-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  27. 14-Nov-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  28. 14-Nov-2022

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  29. 09-Mar-2022

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  30. 07-Feb-2022

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  31. 24-Jan-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish DangreView PDF

  32. 24-Jan-2022

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  33. 24-Jan-2022

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre

  34. 12-Jan-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish DangreView PDF

  35. 17-Dec-2021

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  36. 10-Dec-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. JadhavView PDF

  37. 10-Dec-2021

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  38. 15-Nov-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF

  39. 06-Apr-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  40. 09-Mar-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  41. 09-Mar-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  42. 16-Feb-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  43. 16-Feb-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  44. 02-Feb-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  45. 02-Feb-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  46. 19-Jan-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  47. 19-Jan-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  48. 12-Jan-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  49. 12-Jan-2021

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav

  50. 10-Jul-2020

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  51. 20-Mar-2020

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  52. 28-Feb-2020

    Due Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  53. 11-Feb-2020

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo

  54. 27-Jan-2020

    Urgent Orders -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo

  55. 10-Dec-2019

    For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge

  56. 27-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 31-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/9297/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA/9297/2019 Writ Petition Dismissed: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Siemens Ltd.'s writ petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal's 2018 order, upholding the tribunal's finding that the company employed more than 100 workmen and therefore required government permission under Chapter V-B of the Industrial Disputes Act for its 2014 closure. The court found the company artificially restricted headcount to 99 by misclassifying maintenance and assembly staff, rejected its burden-of-proof arguments, and noted non-production of wage registers warranted adverse inference against the employer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case