VISHWANATH MADUDAPPA DADGE vs T C BENJAMIN AND OTHERS Advocate - Barde Parag Vijay — CP/586/2016
Case under Mah.muncipalties Act 1965. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030306242016
Next Hearing
08th September 2016
Filing Number
CP/24494/2016
Filing Date
05-08-2016
Registration No
CP/586/2016
Registration Date
24-08-2016
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VISHWANATH MADUDAPPA DADGE
Adv. MD SAMIUDDIN M Y CHOUDHARI
Respondent(s)
T C BENJAMIN AND OTHERS Advocate - Barde Parag Vijay
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
NOTIFICATION
AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-09-2016 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 09-04-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 21-10-2016 | AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the contempt order had been complied with and all retiral benefits had been received. The court found the matter resolved and closed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel confirmed that the contempt order had been complied with and all retiral benefits had been received. The court found the matter resolved and closed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts