NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NASHIK, REPRESENTED BY IT S PROJECT DIRECTOR vs KAILASBAI BABULAL OZA AND OTHER — ARBA/10/2019
Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030300202019
Filing Number
ARBA/23010/2019
Filing Date
25-Jul-2019
Registration No
ARBA/10/2019
Registration Date
22-Aug-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NASHIK, REPRESENTED BY IT S PROJECT DIRECTOR
Adv. Manorkar Deepak S
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAILASBAI BABULAL OZA AND OTHER
Adv. ADV. A. B. KALE FOR R/1 TO 9,Kale Ajeet B.,R/10 served (through Son), R/11 served (through nephew) R/12 served (through wife),Kale Ajeet B. 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed NHAI's arbitration appeals (Nos. 9 & 10 of 2019) against Anil D. Sonje and Kailasbai Babulal Oza, finding that NHAI's Section 34 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were filed 26 days beyond the mandatory 3-month plus 30-day deadline, which the court has no power to condone. The court upheld the District Court's dismissal, noting strict adherence to statutory time limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
06-Apr-2026
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
21-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
15-Oct-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit W. Joshi
-
31-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit W. JoshiView PDF
-
31-Jul-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit W. Joshi
-
11-Jul-2025
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit W. Joshi
-
20-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit W. JoshiView PDF
-
25-Apr-2024
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
28-Mar-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF
-
28-Mar-2024
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
28-Feb-2024
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker
-
31-Jan-2024
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
20-Dec-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
20-Dec-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
31-Oct-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
25-Sep-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
07-Aug-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
21-Jun-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi
-
03-Apr-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
24-Feb-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
10-Feb-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
16-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
12-Jan-2023
For Admission - After Notice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
24-Mar-2020
Due Admission -CIVIL
According To Sitting List
-
14-Jan-2020
Due Admission -CIVIL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit B. Deo
-
27-Nov-2019
Due Admission [ After Notice ]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
09-Oct-2019
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF
-
09-Oct-2019
For Admission - Fresh [Civil Side Matters]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge
-
23-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2019
Case filed
Registration No. ARBA/10/2019
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad dismissed NHAI's arbitration appeals (Nos. 9 & 10 of 2019) against Anil D. Sonje and Kailasbai Babulal Oza, finding that NHAI's Section 34 applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were filed 26 days beyond the mandatory 3-month plus 30-day deadline, which the court has no power to condone. The court upheld the District Court's dismissal, noting strict adherence to statutory time limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts