ASHA JAGJEEVANRAO SANGHAI AND ANOTHER DESHPANDE AJAY S. vs RAMESH PAWAR AND OTHERS Advocate - Bora Satyajit S. — CP/666/2018

Case under Service - Family Pension. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030297882018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

25th September 2018

Filing Number

CP/23560/2018

Filing Date

06-08-2018

Registration No

CP/666/2018

Registration Date

24-09-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Service - Family Pension
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

ASHA JAGJEEVANRAO SANGHAI AND ANOTHER DESHPANDE AJAY S.

Respondent(s)

RAMESH PAWAR AND OTHERS Advocate - Bora Satyajit S.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

07-12-2018

URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)

16-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

25-09-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

09-10-2018

AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

25-09-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE
07-12-2018
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANGESH S. PATIL
06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Contempt Petition No. 666/2018 by allowing its unconditional withdrawal on 06.05.2026. The court noted that the primary petitioner had passed away and the underlying contempt order had been substantially complied with. Liberty was granted to the remaining petitioner to pursue fresh proceedings as permitted under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Contempt Petition No. 666/2018 by allowing its unconditional withdrawal on 06.05.2026. The court noted that the primary petitioner had passed away and the underlying contempt order had been substantially complied with. Liberty was granted to the remaining petitioner to pursue fresh proceedings as permitted under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Service - Family Pension Contempt of Court Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case