UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ORS vs VIKRAM RAMBHAJI KARANDE AND ORS — CA/9301/2023
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030296232023
e-Filing Number
20-07-2023
Filing Number
CA/22271/2023
Filing Date
20-Jul-2023
Registration No
CA/9301/2023
Registration Date
28-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ORS
Adv. Talhar Ajay G.
-
2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CENTRAL RAILWAY
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR BEED
-
4.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION JAYAKWADI PROJECT BEED THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIKRAM RAMBHAJI KARANDE AND ORS
-
2.RAMKISAN VIKRAM KARANDE
-
3.NILAWATI VIKRAM KARANDE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of four consolidated civil applications filed by Union of India/Central Railway against various respondents on 4th May 2026. The court ruled that since the underlying first appeals had been disposed of, the pending civil applications no longer survived and were accordingly disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
11-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CA/9301/2023
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of four consolidated civil applications filed by Union of India/Central Railway against various respondents on 4th May 2026. The court ruled that since the underlying first appeals had been disposed of, the pending civil applications no longer survived and were accordingly disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts