NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY IT S PROJECT DIRECTOR vs ANIL D. SONJE AND ANOTHER — ARBA/9/2019
Case under Arbitration and Concilation Act 1996. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030293642019
Next Hearing
23rd August 2019
Filing Number
ARBA/22494/2019
Filing Date
22-07-2019
Registration No
ARBA/9/2019
Registration Date
22-08-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY IT S PROJECT DIRECTOR
Adv. Manorkar Deepak S,Kale Ajeet B.,Kale Ajeet B., ,Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
ANIL D. SONJE AND ANOTHER
Adv. Adv. A. B. Kale V. P filed for R/1 and 2,Kale Ajeet B.,.,Kale Ajeet B. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER
DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ]
FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-11-2019 | DUE ADMISSION [ AFTER NOTICE ] |
| 09-10-2019 | FOR ADMISSION - FRESH [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 14-01-2020 | DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL |
| 23-08-2019 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 06-12-2022 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed NHAI's arbitration appeals against Anil D. Sonje and Kailasbai Babulal Oza because the Section 34 applications challenging the arbitral awards were filed 26 days beyond the mandatory 90+30 day limitation period. The court held it lacks power to condone delay beyond three months plus 30 days under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed NHAI's arbitration appeals against Anil D. Sonje and Kailasbai Babulal Oza because the Section 34 applications challenging the arbitral awards were filed 26 days beyond the mandatory 90+30 day limitation period. The court held it lacks power to condone delay beyond three months plus 30 days under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts