MOHD. NURODDIN MOHD. JAMIRODDIN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/11507/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030293582021

Filing Number

WP/23364/2021

Filing Date

02-Sep-2021

Registration No

WP/11507/2021

Registration Date

12-Oct-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )

Sub-Category

INAM AND WATAN ABOLITION ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 08-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. NURODDIN MOHD. JAMIRODDIN

    Adv. DESHPANDE RAM BABURAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE WAQF OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide on the petitioner's representation dated 21/06/2021 within eight weeks from receipt of the court's order, after hearing the petitioner. The court mandated that the decision be communicated to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  4. 02-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/11507/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide on the petitioner's representation dated 21/06/2021 within eight weeks from receipt of the court's order, after hearing the petitioner. The court mandated that the decision be communicated to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case