UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ORS vs PANDIT YASHWANTA DEOKATE AND ANR — CA/9310/2023
Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal Section 18. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030293332023
e-Filing Number
19-07-2023
Filing Number
CA/22064/2023
Filing Date
19-Jul-2023
Registration No
CA/9310/2023
Registration Date
28-Jul-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ORS
Adv. Talhar Ajay G.
-
2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION CENTRAL RAILWAY
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS COLLECTOR BEED
-
4.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION JAYAKWADI PROJECT DIST BEED THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED
Respondent(s)
-
1.PANDIT YASHWANTA DEOKATE AND ANR
-
2.SHRIKISAN YASHWANTA DEOKATE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Application No. 9310/2023 (and related applications) on May 4, 2026. The court held that since the underlying first appeals had been disposed of, the civil applications no longer survived and were accordingly disposed of. No substantive decision on the merits of the Union of India's challenge against the respondents' claims was detailed in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme
-
11-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CA/9310/2023
The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Civil Application No. 9310/2023 (and related applications) on May 4, 2026. The court held that since the underlying first appeals had been disposed of, the civil applications no longer survived and were accordingly disposed of. No substantive decision on the merits of the Union of India's challenge against the respondents' claims was detailed in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts