SUSHILABAI RAJARAM PITTALWAD P G RODGE AND D N GILCHE vs THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS — WP/7037/2008

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jan-2009

CNR: HCBM030293182008

Filing Number

WP/23461/2008

Filing Date

24-Nov-2008

Registration No

WP/7037/2008

Registration Date

28-Nov-2008

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHILABAI RAJARAM PITTALWAD P G RODGE AND D N GILCHE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP,G P FOR R/ 1 AND 2 R/ 3 TO 5 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petition concerned the disqualification of a Sarpanch for failing to conduct meetings, but since the village panchayat's term had already expired, the court found the petition had no practical utility and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2019

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta

  4. 10-Feb-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  5. 10-Feb-2009

    Urgent Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  6. 20-Jan-2009

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh H. Patil

  8. 24-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7037/2008

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. The petition concerned the disqualification of a Sarpanch for failing to conduct meetings, but since the village panchayat's term had already expired, the court found the petition had no practical utility and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case