PAWANKUMAR ISHWARPRASAD GOYANKA THROUGH LRS SARITA PAWANKUMAR GOYANKA vs JALGAON JANTA SAHKARI BANK LTD JALGAON THROUGH MANAGER AND OTHERS Advocate - NAGARGOJE ANKUSH NIVRUTTI, R/2 AND 3 ARE DELETED — WP/10472/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Sep-2018

CNR: HCBM030290742018

Filing Number

WP/23027/2018

Filing Date

01-Aug-2018

Registration No

WP/10472/2018

Registration Date

12-Sep-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Mah.co-operative Society Act 1960

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWANKUMAR ISHWARPRASAD GOYANKA THROUGH LRS SARITA PAWANKUMAR GOYANKA

    Adv. Shinde Abasaheb D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JALGAON JANTA SAHKARI BANK LTD JALGAON THROUGH MANAGER AND OTHERS Advocate - NAGARGOJE ANKUSH NIVRUTTI, R/2 AND 3 ARE DELETED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao ThombreView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the bank account in dispute had been settled between the parties. Finding no surviving issues, the court discharged the petition on May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

  4. 17-Jun-2020

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    According To Sitting List

  5. 18-Sep-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. GhugeView PDF

  6. 18-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10472/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the bank account in dispute had been settled between the parties. Finding no surviving issues, the court discharged the petition on May 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case