ASHOK VITHALRAO DESHPANDE AND ANOTHER vs EKNATH DAWALE AND OTHERS — CP/573/2018
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030288872018
Next Hearing
06th August 2018
Filing Number
CP/22884/2018
Filing Date
31-07-2018
Registration No
CP/573/2018
Registration Date
03-08-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOK VITHALRAO DESHPANDE AND ANOTHER
Adv. JADHAVAR SANTOSH SAMPATRAO
Respondent(s)
EKNATH DAWALE AND OTHERS
Adv. ,Nirmal Ramchandra J.,R.3 SERVED,Govt. Pleader,Govt. Pleader 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)
URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL)
REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL)
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
URGENT CIRCULATION (WP)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-11-2019 | REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL) |
| 02-04-2019 | URGENT ORDERS (CIVIL) |
| 19-03-2020 | REGULAR ADMISSION (CIVIL) |
| 06-08-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 19-06-2019 | URGENT CIRCULATION (WP) |
Orders
The High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order by considering the petitioners for absorption only if they possessed requisite qualifications. Since the petitioners were found ineligible upon verification, the contempt direction was deemed satisfied. The petition was disposed of as the petitioners had already undertaken to challenge their invalidation through separate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order by considering the petitioners for absorption only if they possessed requisite qualifications. Since the petitioners were found ineligible upon verification, the contempt direction was deemed satisfied. The petition was disposed of as the petitioners had already undertaken to challenge their invalidation through separate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts