ASHOK VITHALRAO DESHPANDE AND ANOTHER vs EKNATH DAWALE AND OTHERS — CP/573/2018

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Aug-2018

CNR: HCBM030288872018

Filing Number

CP/22884/2018

Filing Date

31-Jul-2018

Registration No

CP/573/2018

Registration Date

03-Aug-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK VITHALRAO DESHPANDE AND ANOTHER

    Adv. JADHAVAR SANTOSH SAMPATRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EKNATH DAWALE AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,Nirmal Ramchandra J.,R.3 SERVED,Govt. Pleader,Govt. Pleader 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order by considering the petitioners for absorption only if they possessed requisite qualifications. Since the petitioners were found ineligible upon verification, the contempt direction was deemed satisfied. The petition was disposed of as the petitioners had already undertaken to challenge their invalidation through separate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  4. 19-Jun-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  5. 02-Apr-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  6. 23-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2024

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  8. 12-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  9. 12-Jan-2024

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  10. 01-Dec-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat , Hon'ble Shri Justice Neeraj P. Dhote

  11. 25-Oct-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  12. 19-Mar-2020

    Regular Admission (Civil)

    According To Sitting List

  13. 08-Nov-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. KilorView PDF

  14. 08-Nov-2019

    Regular Admission (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor

  15. 19-Jun-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. AvachatView PDF

  16. 19-Jun-2019

    Urgent Circulation (Wp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat

  17. 02-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. SambreView PDF

  18. 02-Apr-2019

    Urgent Orders (Civil)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre

  19. 06-Aug-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  20. 06-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 31-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/573/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court dismissed the contempt petition, finding that respondents had complied with the earlier contempt order by considering the petitioners for absorption only if they possessed requisite qualifications. Since the petitioners were found ineligible upon verification, the contempt direction was deemed satisfied. The petition was disposed of as the petitioners had already undertaken to challenge their invalidation through separate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case