MAHESHPRASAD DWARKADAS JAISWAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/570/2018

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030285532018

Filing Number

CP/22608/2018

Filing Date

30-Jul-2018

Registration No

CP/570/2018

Registration Date

03-Aug-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Bombay Prohibition Act
Contempt of Court Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHPRASAD DWARKADAS JAISWAL

    Adv. Patil Hanmant V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. ,Govt. Pleader,Govt. Pleader FOR R/3 1123

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/570/2018 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final opportunity to deposit interest as per its earlier order dated 06.05.2026, at the request of the Additional Public Prosecutor. The case has been adjourned to 22.06.2026 for further proceedings. The petitioner was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  5. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  6. 06-May-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  7. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  8. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  9. 26-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  10. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  11. 06-May-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  12. 01-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  13. 01-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  14. 01-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  15. 01-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  16. 09-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  17. 09-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme

  18. 12-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. BrahmeView PDF

  19. 12-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

  20. 13-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. G. Avachat,hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

  21. 19-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  22. 06-Aug-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  23. 06-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 30-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/570/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/570/2018 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) granted a final opportunity to deposit interest as per its earlier order dated 06.05.2026, at the request of the Additional Public Prosecutor. The case has been adjourned to 22.06.2026 for further proceedings. The petitioner was absent during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case