SHAIKH SHAHIDA BEGUM P S DIGHE vs THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND ORS — WP/7207/2007

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 07-Mar-2008

CNR: HCBM030285162007

Filing Number

WP/22364/2007

Filing Date

01-Dec-2007

Registration No

WP/7207/2007

Registration Date

11-Dec-2007

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1958 & Ruls

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAIKH SHAHIDA BEGUM P S DIGHE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND ORS

    Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP,Dhumal S.A. (Tambat) Mrs.,G P FOR R/ 1 TO 4 R/ 9 TO 19 AND 21 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Shaikh Shahida Begum's writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's own submission that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous and no longer served any practical purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2019

    For Ordinary Matters On Warned List ( S.J. )

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta

  4. 28-Mar-2008

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B R Gavai

  5. 07-Mar-2008

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Dec-2007

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7207/2007

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Shaikh Shahida Begum's writ petition as infructuous based on the petitioner's own submission that due to passage of time, the petition had become infructuous and no longer served any practical purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case