DR. MANISHA MANIKRAV PAWAR AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAH AND OTHERS — CP/471/2015

Case under Mah.university Act 1994. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030282422015

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

19th August 2015

Filing Number

CP/22407/2015

Filing Date

31-07-2015

Registration No

CP/471/2015

Registration Date

13-08-2015

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah.university Act 1994
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

DR. MANISHA MANIKRAV PAWAR AND OTHERS

Adv. BHANDARI ANAND P.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAH AND OTHERS

Adv. ,Dankh Sachin V.,GP FOR R.1,R.2 & 5 SERVED 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

24-06-2016

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

18-04-2016

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

16-09-2015

AWAIT NOTICES -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

31-03-2020

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

19-08-2015

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Dr. Manisha Manikrav Pawar and others against the State of Maharashtra, as the respondents had already complied with the earlier contempt order. The court accepted the petitioners' submission and confirmed compliance through the state's counsel, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Dr. Manisha Manikrav Pawar and others against the State of Maharashtra, as the respondents had already complied with the earlier contempt order. The court accepted the petitioners' submission and confirmed compliance through the state's counsel, thereby closing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case