PURUSHOTTAM RUSTUMRAO WAVALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/9178/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 14, 21 AND 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030278342025
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
WP/20669/2025
Filing Date
10-07-2025
Registration No
WP/9178/2025
Registration Date
24-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PURUSHOTTAM RUSTUMRAO WAVALE
Adv. TUKARAM MARUTI VENJANE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. VALSE VIKRANT S FOR R. NO. 5,AGP for R. Nos. 1 to 4. 1123
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AURANGABAD
THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY ZILLA PARISHAD PARBHANI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. B. SURYAWANSHI , HON'BLE JUSTICE VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-07-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-06-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 21-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 11-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 21-11-2025 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/9178/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 22 June 2026. Petitioner's counsel must remove office objections within six weeks or face dismissal in default. The State's counsel was granted time to file a reply by 22 June 2026, with a warning that Respondent No.3 must appear personally if the reply is not filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/9178/2025 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the writ petition to 22 June 2026. Petitioner's counsel must remove office objections within six weeks or face dismissal in default. The State's counsel was granted time to file a reply by 22 June 2026, with a warning that Respondent No.3 must appear personally if the reply is not filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts