DHARAMSINGH PRATAPSING MARMAT vs DEVIDAS TATYARAO KUKDE AND ORS — WP/341/2009

Case under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1968. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Jun-2009

CNR: HCBM030277712008

Filing Number

WP/22192/2008

Filing Date

10-Nov-2008

Registration No

WP/341/2009

Registration Date

19-Jan-2009

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act 1968

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHARAMSINGH PRATAPSING MARMAT

    Adv. KATNESHWARKAR P R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVIDAS TATYARAO KUKDE AND ORS

    Adv. R/1 SERVED 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. PednekerView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on May 5, 2026. The petition, filed in 2009, concerned a 2005 Village Panchayat election dispute between Dharamsingh Pratapsing Marmat and Devidas Tatyarao Kukde. Due to the passage of time since the original election, the court found the matter no longer capable of practical remedy and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Jun-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B R GavaiView PDF

  4. 24-Jun-2009

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B R Gavai

  5. 29-Apr-2009

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B R Gavai

  6. 10-Nov-2008

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/341/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed the writ petition as infructuous on May 5, 2026. The petition, filed in 2009, concerned a 2005 Village Panchayat election dispute between Dharamsingh Pratapsing Marmat and Devidas Tatyarao Kukde. Due to the passage of time since the original election, the court found the matter no longer capable of practical remedy and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case