THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS vs AZAD EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY PARBHANI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ALISHAH AZAD KHAN — CA/10893/2009

Case under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030277572009

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

CA/22513/2009

Filing Date

07-10-2009

Registration No

CA/10893/2009

Registration Date

12-10-2009

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Trade Unions Act, 1926

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND ORS

Adv. Govt. Pleader

Respondent(s)

AZAD EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY PARBHANI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ALISHAH AZAD KHAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

27-04-2020

URGENT ORDERS -CIVIL

11-06-2026

FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL

06-05-2026

FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL

30-04-2026

FOR FINAL HEARING -CIVIL

20-04-2026

FOR ORDERS - COPIES NOT SUPPLIED -CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE KISHORE C. SANT,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT B. KADETHANKAR

Case Summary: In this writ petition, school employees sought appointment after their school closed in 2000. A factual dispute arose regarding whether petitioners submitted resignations in 2001—Respondent No. 5 claimed they did, while petitioners and Respondent No. 4 denied this. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench adjourned the case, directing Respondent No. 5 to file an affidavit in reply to address the conflicting claims, with next hearing scheduled for September 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this writ petition, school employees sought appointment after their school closed in 2000. A factual dispute arose regarding whether petitioners submitted resignations in 2001—Respondent No. 5 claimed they did, while petitioners and Respondent No. 4 denied this. The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench adjourned the case, directing Respondent No. 5 to file an affidavit in reply to address the conflicting claims, with next hearing scheduled for September 30, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case