SANJAY SAHEBRAO ALIAS RAJEBHAU SHINDE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — APPLN/2564/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030277052025
e-Filing Number
07-07-2025
Filing Number
APPLN/7108/2025
Filing Date
09-Jul-2025
Registration No
APPLN/2564/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY SAHEBRAO ALIAS RAJEBHAU SHINDE
Adv. Salunke Sudarshan J
-
2.Vijaykumar Maruti Gadade
-
3.Sarubhau Ashok Shinde (named as Gotu Asaram Shinde in FIR)
-
4.Asaram Sahebrao Shinde (Named as Asaram Rajebhau Shinde in FIR)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
-
2.Muktabai Bhagwan Shinde(Since deceased) Through dependent and her daughter Somitra Sandipan Lokhande
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard Criminal Application No. 2564/2025 filed by Sanjay Sahebrao alias Rajebhau Shinde and others against the State of Maharashtra on June 11, 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable on July 9, 2026, with the State's APP waiving notice requirement. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
For Admission - Fresh - Criminal Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
09-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. APPLN/2564/2025
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) heard Criminal Application No. 2564/2025 filed by Sanjay Sahebrao alias Rajebhau Shinde and others against the State of Maharashtra on June 11, 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable on July 9, 2026, with the State's APP waiving notice requirement. No substantive order on merits was passed; the case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts