BABAN ASHRU SUPEKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/555/2016

Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Aug-2016

CNR: HCBM030276302016

Filing Number

CP/21997/2016

Filing Date

20-Jul-2016

Registration No

CP/555/2016

Registration Date

11-Aug-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981
Contempt of Court Act
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABAN ASHRU SUPEKAR

    Adv. Gitte Mukund D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. R/2 SERVED. 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after petitioner's counsel submitted that the contempt order had been complied with by deciding the petitioner's proposal. Finding no remaining issues, the court allowed the petition to stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 29-Sep-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. WadaneView PDF

  5. 29-Sep-2016

    Due Admission -CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala , Hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. Wadane

  6. 18-Aug-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice K.L. WadaneView PDF

  7. 18-Aug-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/555/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after petitioner's counsel submitted that the contempt order had been complied with by deciding the petitioner's proposal. Finding no remaining issues, the court allowed the petition to stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case