BABAN ASHRU SUPEKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — CP/555/2016

Case under M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030276302016

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th August 2016

Filing Number

CP/21997/2016

Filing Date

20-07-2016

Registration No

CP/555/2016

Registration Date

11-08-2016

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

M.e.p.s.act 1977 and Rules 1981
Contempt of Court Act
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

BABAN ASHRU SUPEKAR

Adv. Gitte Mukund D.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. R/2 SERVED. 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

18-08-2016

URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL

09-04-2020

NOTIFICATION

29-09-2016

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after petitioner's counsel submitted that the contempt order had been complied with by deciding the petitioner's proposal. Finding no remaining issues, the court allowed the petition to stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after petitioner's counsel submitted that the contempt order had been complied with by deciding the petitioner's proposal. Finding no remaining issues, the court allowed the petition to stand disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case