THE SECRETARY LOKMANYA TILAK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANOTHER DR. R.J. GODBOLE FOR PETITIONER vs PRASHANT BHASKARRAO LASONKAR AND OTHERS — WP/6893/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030275032022

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/20460/2022

Filing Date

03-08-2022

Registration No

WP/6893/2023

Registration Date

23-06-2023

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Bench Type

Single

Category

SERVICE MATTERS OTHER THAN ID ACT AND RELATED ENACTMENT ( 35 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227
Mah.university Act 1994

Petitioner(s)

THE SECRETARY LOKMANYA TILAK SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AND ANOTHER DR. R.J. GODBOLE FOR PETITIONER

THE HEAD MASTER SHRI SWAMI VIVEKANAND MADHYAMIK VIDYALAYA

Respondent(s)

PRASHANT BHASKARRAO LASONKAR AND OTHERS

Adv. COPY SERVED ON GP, CAVEAT FILED BY ADV. P.D. TALEKAR FOR R/1,AGP For R.Nos. 2 and 3.,. 1123

THE EDUCATION OFFICER SECONDARY

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

17-10-2022

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

14-11-2022

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

21-11-2022

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME)

05-12-2022

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (THIRD TIME)

28-06-2023

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

10-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

In WP/6893/2023, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case for three weeks on June 10, 2026. No parties appeared before the court, and no substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely stood over for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In WP/6893/2023, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) adjourned the case for three weeks on June 10, 2026. No parties appeared before the court, and no substantive order on merits was passed; the matter was merely stood over for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case