THE STATE OF MAH THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS vs CHANBASAPPA SANGRAM PATIL, DIED THR. L.R. GANESH Advocate - Kale Ajeet B. — CA/12530/2011

Case under Land Acquisition Act - Appeal. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 02-Feb-2012

CNR: HCBM030271472011

Filing Number

CA/22001/2011

Filing Date

26-Aug-2011

Registration No

CA/12530/2011

Registration Date

18-Oct-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act - Appeal

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAH THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS

    Adv. Govt. Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANBASAPPA SANGRAM PATIL, DIED THR. L.R. GANESH Advocate - Kale Ajeet B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. DeshmukhView PDF

    Summary of CA 12530/2011 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) condoned a 379-day delay in filing first appeals by the State of Maharashtra against land compensation awards, accepting that the delay resulted from processing sanction requirements from the Law and Judiciary Department. The court then disposed of the appeals based on a 2016 State Government policy decision not to contest appeals where compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court falls within four times the amount awarded by SLAO, finding this case met that criterion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Jul-2020

    CIVIL Application For Condonation Of Delay

    According To Sitting List

  4. 02-Feb-2012

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.T. JoshiView PDF

  5. 02-Feb-2012

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Aug-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/12530/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CA 12530/2011 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) condoned a 379-day delay in filing first appeals by the State of Maharashtra against land compensation awards, accepting that the delay resulted from processing sanction requirements from the Law and Judiciary Department. The court then disposed of the appeals based on a 2016 State Government policy decision not to contest appeals where compensation awarded by the Land Reference Court falls within four times the amount awarded by SLAO, finding this case met that criterion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case