SACHIN GANESH AGRAWAL AND ANR vs SHIVDAS TUKARAM BHOI AND ORS — CA/10265/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM030269972025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CA/20057/2025

Filing Date

05-07-2025

Registration No

CA/10265/2025

Registration Date

19-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

MACP - SINGLE BENCH ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act 1939 & 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

SACHIN GANESH AGRAWAL AND ANR

Adv. SHAH SUBODH P.

SANJAY DEELIP GAVIT

Respondent(s)

SHIVDAS TUKARAM BHOI AND ORS

Adv. R/ 2 and 3 served,R/1 SERVED 1123

RAVINDRA JALAMCHAND JAIN

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DHULE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

12-08-2025

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (FIRST TIME)

19-08-2025

OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED (SECOND TIME)

20-09-2025

CIVIL APPLICATION FOR CONDONATIN OF DELAY - CIVIL

15-04-2026

FOR ORDERS

04-03-2026

FOR ORDERS

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY A. DESHMUKH

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to condone a 479-day delay in filing the first appeal in the interest of justice and registered the appeal. The court also granted a stay on execution of the impugned judgment and award pending appeal, after the applicants deposited 50% of the awarded amount in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad allowed the application to condone a 479-day delay in filing the first appeal in the interest of justice and registered the appeal. The court also granted a stay on execution of the impugned judgment and award pending appeal, after the applicants deposited 50% of the awarded amount in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case