Sneha Yogesh Aware And Another SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDARRAO vs Sambhaji Gangadhar Aware And Others — MCA/210/2025
Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 22nd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030265152025
e-Filing Number
30-06-2025
Filing Number
MCA/19731/2025
Filing Date
02-07-2025
Registration No
MCA/210/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Withdrawn
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sneha Yogesh Aware And Another SURYAWANSHI KAMLAKAR JALINDARRAO
Aarohi Yogesh Aware
Respondent(s)
Sambhaji Gangadhar Aware And Others
Adv. R/1 SERVED,R/2 SERVED THROUGH HUSBAND I.E. R/1,R/3 SERVED THROUGH FATHER I.E. R/1,Pankaj A. Bharat,ADV. PANKAJ A. BHARAT FOR R/1 TO 5 (VP FILED) 1123
Sanjivani Sambhaji Aware
Sarika Sambhaji Aware
Ujjwala Nitin Pambale
Rohini Ranjit Pambale
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABHAY J. MANTRI
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS
FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-07-2025 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 22-04-2026 | |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS |
| 23-03-2026 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 210 of 2025 filed by Sneha Yogesh Aware and another against Sambhaji Gangadhar Aware and others as withdrawn. After the court indicated its disinclination to entertain the application, the applicants' advocate sought instructions and subsequently informed the court that the applicants wished to withdraw the application, which was accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) dismissed Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 210 of 2025 filed by Sneha Yogesh Aware and another against Sambhaji Gangadhar Aware and others as withdrawn. After the court indicated its disinclination to entertain the application, the applicants' advocate sought instructions and subsequently informed the court that the applicants wished to withdraw the application, which was accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts