SHRINIVAS KASHINATH SATPUTE DIED THROUGH LRS SURESH SHRINIVAS SATPUTE AND OTHERS vs BABASAHEB MANIKRAO SATPUTE DIED THROUGH LRS PRALHAD BABASAHEB SATPUTE AND OTHERS — WP/7808/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM030264212024

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/18702/2024

Filing Date

11-07-2024

Registration No

WP/7808/2024

Registration Date

25-07-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Maharashtra Land Revenue Code

Petitioner(s)

SHRINIVAS KASHINATH SATPUTE DIED THROUGH LRS SURESH SHRINIVAS SATPUTE AND OTHERS

Adv. Mahajan Sandeep Y.

SANJIVAN KASHINATH SATPUTE

DADARAO KASHINATH SATPUTE

MURLIDHAR YASHWANT SATPUTE

GANDHARIBAI MURLIDHAR JOGDAND

Respondent(s)

BABASAHEB MANIKRAO SATPUTE DIED THROUGH LRS PRALHAD BABASAHEB SATPUTE AND OTHERS

Adv. Sushant Baburao Choudhari FOR R/1 (A TO F) 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

29-07-2024

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

15-06-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

04-05-2026

DUE ADMISSION CIVIL

25-02-2026
23-01-2026

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NEERAJ P. DHOTE

Case Summary: WP/7808/2024 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench adjourned the writ petition to the week commencing June 15, 2026, after summer vacation. The petitioner's advocate mentioned personal difficulties and could not attend the afternoon session. Any interim relief granted previously will continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/7808/2024 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench adjourned the writ petition to the week commencing June 15, 2026, after summer vacation. The petitioner's advocate mentioned personal difficulties and could not attend the afternoon session. Any interim relief granted previously will continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case